, home
Customer access Request an enterprise demo
Request an enterprise demo Customer access

Enterprise operations / APPLICATION BLUEPRINT

Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry

Organises hypotheses associated with shared service transitions, records experiment costs and defines measurable acceptance conditions.

Start with this blueprintExplore illustrative interface

14 workspace menus · 13 business workflows · 5 role profiles

Application blueprint only. This is a proposed design, not a deployed or production-tested system. Screens and sample figures are illustrative; workflows, business rules, approvals, permissions and integrations require confirmation before build.

Designed for operations coordinators and the responsible business owners

Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry workspace interface preview; illustrative records and figures.
Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry — operational workspaceIllustrative interface · Sample dataView full interface →

Explore an illustrative interface.

Illustrative workspace and record review. Select a concept screen to inspect it in full.

Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry workspace interface preview; illustrative records and figures.
Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry — operational workspaceIllustrative interface · Sample dataView full interface →
Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry record interface preview; illustrative records and figures.
Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry — record and workflow reviewIllustrative interface · Sample dataView full interface →

Operational dashboards and work queues.

Operational views

Review work, evidence, exceptions and authorised decisions within a defined operating scope.

Business unitPeriodAssigned teamReview state

Dashboard measures

  • Active operational records
    Count of all records in the selected workspace.
  • Review queue
    Records at the third stage of the business workflow.
  • Needs attention
    Records with an assigned review requirement.
  • Final-stage records
    Records in the fourth business workflow stage.

Business workflow and operating scope

Organises hypotheses associated with shared service transitions, records experiment costs and defines measurable acceptance conditions. Coordinates participant permissions, compares observed outcomes and routes scale-or-stop decisions, retaining failed experiments and assumptions for subsequent investment reviews.

Operations

Operational overview

Review the work position and priority actions.

Hypotheses

Coordinate hypotheses with assigned responsibilities, linked records and review history.

Experiment costs

Coordinate experiment costs with assigned responsibilities, linked records and review history.

Measurable acceptance conditions

Coordinate measurable acceptance conditions with assigned responsibilities, linked records and review history.

Participant permissions

Coordinate participant permissions with assigned responsibilities, linked records and review history.

Observed outcomes

Coordinate observed outcomes with assigned responsibilities, linked records and review history.

Scale-or-stop decisions

Coordinate scale-or-stop decisions with assigned responsibilities, linked records and review history.

Retaining failed experiments

Coordinate retaining failed experiments with assigned responsibilities, linked records and review history.

Assumptions

Coordinate assumptions with assigned responsibilities, linked records and review history.

Hypotheses associated

Coordinate hypotheses associated with assigned responsibilities, linked records and review history.

Insights

Reports and saved views

Review the reporting scope and export agreed operational views.

Governance

Approvals and exceptions

Review delegated decisions, exceptions and recorded conditions.

Audit history

Trace accepted changes, decisions and accountable actions.

Access and configuration

Manage the agreed role permissions and configurable operating rules.

The end-to-end business journey.

From intake to authorised completion, with evidence at each decision.

01

Register the operating requirement

Establish the scope of hypotheses associated, capture the required records and assign the accountable team.

02

Coordinate records and evidence

Coordinate experiment costs, measurable acceptance conditions, with linked evidence and visible outstanding actions.

03

Review exceptions and authorise action

Review the relevant conditions and exceptions. Record the authorised outcome and its supporting evidence.

04

Track completion and follow-up

Confirm the resulting records and handovers. Track remaining obligations, later changes and follow-up actions.

Business workflows

Select a workflow to review the steps, responsibilities, approval and exception handling.

01 · Organise hypotheses

Coordinate hypotheses within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Hypotheses requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Operations coordinator

  • Register hypotheses and its operating scope
  • Assign the accountable owner and required actions
  • Review the relevant evidence and unresolved conditions
  • Confirm the accepted outcome and retain its history

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
Required information or responsibility is missing, or an operating condition changes.

Outcome
A completed operating record with its linked evidence and remaining obligations.

02 · Record experiment costs

Coordinate experiment costs within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Experiment costs requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Authorised approver

  • Register experiment costs and its operating scope
  • Compare amounts, attribution and accepted conditions
  • Route differences to the accountable finance reviewer
  • Record authorised adjustments and the accepted position

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
Amounts, ownership or allocation evidence do not agree.

Outcome
A reconciled position, approved adjustments and separately owned outstanding items.

03 · Define measurable acceptance conditions

Coordinate measurable acceptance conditions within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Measurable acceptance conditions requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Authorised approver

  • Register measurable acceptance conditions and its operating scope
  • Collect the linked records and qualified evidence
  • Assign the responsible reviewer and record findings
  • Accept the outcome or assign corrective follow-up

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
Evidence is incomplete, disputed, expired or outside the reviewer’s authority.

Outcome
A review finding, its accepted evidence and any accountable corrective actions.

04 · Coordinate participant permissions

Coordinate participant permissions within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Participant permissions requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Operations coordinator

  • Register participant permissions and its operating scope
  • Check permitted purpose, prerequisites and authority
  • Record the delegated approval or refusal
  • Track term, withdrawal and later changes

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
Authority is missing, permission changes or the requested purpose exceeds the accepted scope.

Outcome
A scoped permission or recorded refusal, its conditions and review history.

05 · Compare observed outcomes

Coordinate observed outcomes within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Observed outcomes requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Operations coordinator

  • Register observed outcomes and its operating scope
  • Assign the accountable owner and required actions
  • Review the relevant evidence and unresolved conditions
  • Confirm the accepted outcome and retain its history

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
Required information or responsibility is missing, or an operating condition changes.

Outcome
A completed operating record with its linked evidence and remaining obligations.

06 · Route scale-or-stop decisions

Coordinate scale-or-stop decisions within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Scale-or-stop decisions requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Operations coordinator

  • Register scale-or-stop decisions and its operating scope
  • Gather the relevant evidence and review options
  • Route the case to the delegated decision owner
  • Record the outcome, conditions and follow-up obligations

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
The case exceeds delegation, contains a conflict or has disputed evidence.

Outcome
An authorised decision or escalation with accountable resolution actions.

07 · Route retaining failed experiments

Coordinate retaining failed experiments within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Retaining failed experiments requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Operations coordinator

  • Register retaining failed experiments and its operating scope
  • Compare options, dependencies and operating constraints
  • Review the selected option with its accountable owners
  • Accept the plan and track its delivery conditions

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
An assumption changes, prerequisites are missing or stakeholders cannot accept the proposed commitment.

Outcome
An approved operating plan and owned actions for its accepted conditions.

08 · Route assumptions

Coordinate assumptions within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Assumptions requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Authorised approver

  • Register assumptions and its operating scope
  • Collect the linked records and qualified evidence
  • Assign the responsible reviewer and record findings
  • Accept the outcome or assign corrective follow-up

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
Evidence is incomplete, disputed, expired or outside the reviewer’s authority.

Outcome
A review finding, its accepted evidence and any accountable corrective actions.

09 · Register the operating requirement

Coordinate operating requirement within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Operating requirement requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Operations coordinator

  • Register operating requirement and its operating scope
  • Compare options, dependencies and operating constraints
  • Review the selected option with its accountable owners
  • Accept the plan and track its delivery conditions

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
An assumption changes, prerequisites are missing or stakeholders cannot accept the proposed commitment.

Outcome
An approved operating plan and owned actions for its accepted conditions.

10 · Resolve operating exceptions

Coordinate operating exceptions within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Operating exceptions requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Operations coordinator

  • Register operating exceptions and its operating scope
  • Gather the relevant evidence and review options
  • Route the case to the delegated decision owner
  • Record the outcome, conditions and follow-up obligations

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
The case exceeds delegation, contains a conflict or has disputed evidence.

Outcome
An authorised decision or escalation with accountable resolution actions.

11 · Verify completion and follow-up

Coordinate completion and follow-up within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Completion and follow-up requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Authorised approver

  • Register completion and follow-up and its operating scope
  • Collect the linked records and qualified evidence
  • Assign the responsible reviewer and record findings
  • Accept the outcome or assign corrective follow-up

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
Evidence is incomplete, disputed, expired or outside the reviewer’s authority.

Outcome
A review finding, its accepted evidence and any accountable corrective actions.

12 · Review controlled operating changes

Coordinate controlled operating changes within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Controlled operating changes requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Authorised approver

  • Register controlled operating changes and its operating scope
  • Collect the linked records and qualified evidence
  • Assign the responsible reviewer and record findings
  • Accept the outcome or assign corrective follow-up

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
Evidence is incomplete, disputed, expired or outside the reviewer’s authority.

Outcome
A review finding, its accepted evidence and any accountable corrective actions.

13 · Prepare scoped operational reports

Coordinate scoped operational reports within Shared Service Centre Business Model Experiment Registry.

Trigger
Scoped operational reports requires a new record, an agreed review or a controlled change.

Responsible role
Operations coordinator

  • Register scoped operational reports and its operating scope
  • Assign the accountable owner and required actions
  • Review the relevant evidence and unresolved conditions
  • Confirm the accepted outcome and retain its history

Approval
Assurance reviewer records the decision when the action changes an accepted commitment or requires delegated authority.

Exception handling
Required information or responsibility is missing, or an operating condition changes.

Outcome
A completed operating record with its linked evidence and remaining obligations.

Governance and control

  • Role permissions reflect the agreed responsibilities and restricted record access.
  • Required information and evidence are checked before the relevant decision or handover.
  • Exceptions have a named owner, recorded reason and an authorised resolution.
  • Approved changes retain their previous values, accountable decisions and linked evidence.
  • Integration mappings, business rules and acceptance criteria are reviewed with the customer.
Operating rules by business workflow
  • For hypotheses, the record retains an accountable owner, its supporting evidence and accepted outcome.
  • For experiment costs, adjustments require source evidence, a recorded reason and authorised financial review.
  • For measurable acceptance conditions, evidence, reviewer authority and acceptance conditions are visible before a reviewed outcome is accepted.
  • For participant permissions, the request stays within the recorded permission and delegated authority.
  • For observed outcomes, the record retains an accountable owner, its supporting evidence and accepted outcome.
  • For scale-or-stop decisions, a decision retains its authority, reason, supporting evidence and resulting obligations.
  • For retaining failed experiments, the accepted plan records assumptions, rejected alternatives, dependencies and conditions.
  • For assumptions, evidence, reviewer authority and acceptance conditions are visible before a reviewed outcome is accepted.
  • For operating requirement, the accepted plan records assumptions, rejected alternatives, dependencies and conditions.
  • For operating exceptions, a decision retains its authority, reason, supporting evidence and resulting obligations.
  • For completion and follow-up, evidence, reviewer authority and acceptance conditions are visible before a reviewed outcome is accepted.
  • For controlled operating changes, evidence, reviewer authority and acceptance conditions are visible before a reviewed outcome is accepted.
  • For scoped operational reports, the record retains an accountable owner, its supporting evidence and accepted outcome.

Data, interfaces and operating requirements.

Core records

Operational recordHypotheses associatedExperiment costsMeasurable acceptance conditionsParticipant permissionsObserved outcomesDecisionSupporting evidenceActivity history
Record fields and linked information
  • Record identifier — Stable reference for the operating transaction.
  • Business unit — Business scope used for responsibility and reporting.
  • Operating subject — The request, commitment or work item being handled.
  • Accountable owner — Named responsibility for the next action.
  • Workflow stage — Current position in the agreed business journey.
  • Review requirement — Required review and outstanding decision.
  • Due or review date — Agreed action window or review trigger.
  • Linked evidence — Source records supporting the operating decision.
  • Decision authority — The delegated authority relevant to the accepted outcome.
  • Accepted outcome — Recorded decision and its business consequences.
  • Follow-up obligation — Remaining responsibilities after an accepted action.
  • Revision history — Trace of accepted changes and their evidence.
  • Hypotheses reference — Link the relevant hypotheses to the operating transaction and its decision evidence.
  • Experiment costs reference — Link the relevant experiment costs to the operating transaction and its decision evidence.
  • Measurable acceptance conditions reference — Link the relevant measurable acceptance conditions to the operating transaction and its decision evidence.
  • Participant permissions reference — Link the relevant participant permissions to the operating transaction and its decision evidence.
  • Observed outcomes reference — Link the relevant observed outcomes to the operating transaction and its decision evidence.

Systems and interfaces

  • ERP or existing operational records
  • Approved reporting and service interfaces
  • Identity and role-based access services
  • Approved document and communication services

Interface scope, data mapping and testing are agreed for each engagement.

Implementation requirements
Confirm the operating boundaries, hypotheses associated, responsible roles, review authority, record retention, interface mappings and acceptance scenarios.

Mobile and tablet access

Authorised users can review hypotheses associated, supporting records and assigned actions through mobile and tablet access. The relevant tasks and permissions are agreed for the deployment.

Access approved workflows through the Dalfin mobile app. Device tasks and permissions are confirmed for the deployment.

Apple App Store ↗Google Play ↗

AI extensions

Core workflows and approval rules are defined with your business owners. Operational AI can be assessed separately against a specific business outcome and review requirements.

AI extensions are scoped around the required data, business outcome and review controls.

Engineered with Genesis.

Structured application engineering

Connect requirements, roles, records, workflows and interfaces through the agreed Genesis engineering process.

Controlled changes

Review dependency impact and validation requirements. Context Memory supports governed changes and accepted application revisions.

Deployment and support

Agree customer cloud or on-premises requirements, device access, implementation acceptance and ongoing engineering support.

AN EXAMPLE OPERATING SCENARIO

What to validate in a scoped demonstration.

Start with hypotheses associated and follow the record through coordinate records and evidence. Introduce a missing item or operating exception, record the authorised resolution and inspect the final handover, evidence and history.

What to review

  • A saved end-to-end transaction
  • An exception and its authorised resolution
  • Different operator, approver and reviewer permissions
  • Final records, history and the relevant report
Discuss this solution

Questions before implementation.

What can we review in a tailored demonstration?

Review a representative operational record, its workflow stages, accountable roles, an exception and the resulting operational report. Bring the business process and existing system requirements that matter to your organisation.

How is the solution adapted to our organisation?

The operating scope covers your records, role permissions, review authority, business rules and integration boundaries. These requirements are agreed with the responsible business owners.

How does the solution connect with existing systems?

Connection design defines interfaces, data ownership, mapping, authentication and exception handling. The agreed implementation includes validation against the selected systems and workflows.

How are subsequent changes controlled?

The agreed engineering approach covers review of change impact, bounded implementation, validation and accepted revisions. Discuss the relevant Genesis Context Memory and support requirements during solution scoping.